Project description Scenario You are equity investment analyst in a major investment bank in the city of London. Your are part of the team specializing in Energy sector and moreprecisely in the Oil and Gas Group. As part of your job at the bank, you regularly carry out financial and operational performance analysis ofcompanies listed on the London and Global Stock Exchanges in order to recommend to potential clients whether they should buy, hold or sell shares incompanies with heavy exposure of Oil and Gas. Required: Carry out a detailed analysis on two listed PLCs 1) British Petroleum Plc and 2) Shell Plc.. the period of analysis should be 2012-2013.A) a discussion of the relationship between the firm?s objectives, its budget, budgeting control, including issues of cash flows forecasting andcapital investment appraisal. You are expected to examine key factors such as the prices of given energy commodity such as Brent, WTI, Sahari, LNG,Benzine, LPG, Jetfuel, Diesel, Gasoline, etc that contributes to a firm?s survival discussing the firm?s goals, growth strategies , budgetingplanning, employee motivation, etc. (1100 words)B) Risk and Return measurement via CAPM and the financial Stability of the two companies BP and Shell Plc. You are expected to carry out thecalculation of the relationship between the risk of the company shares, the market price and the expected return to the investor using of the CapitalAsset Pricing model (CAPM) [Rs=Risk free rate +(market risk premium)*beta ] as a financial tool. Your ar expected to assess the business (commodity)and financial risks of the two companies BP Plc and Shell Plc.You should also compare them by measuring the volatility of their returns on the assetand sensitivity to market and Oil and (or) Gas price fluctuations.(650 words)(calculations in excel sheet)Topic: Rhetorical Analysis for Tortilla Curtain by T.C. BoyleOrder DescriptionVriting 1 Fall 2014Essay 3 OzimaEssay 3: Rhetorical AnalysisFor essay three, you Will be analyzing Tortilla Curtain by TC. Boyle for Boyle?s presentation of illegalimmigration. There are many facets to illegal immigration and to this end, you will need to pick one facet ofillegal immigration presented in the novel: illegal migrant working conditions, citizens: opinions, illegal migrantshealth conditions, the building of walls, the laws surrounding illegal immigration, the legal precedent Boyle isresponding too. Keep in mind this is only the beginning to the potential areas of focus available to you, so Isuggest spending some time researching and understanding the issues surrounding immigration. Whenresearching, choose credible sources that initiate and understand the complexity to both sides of the argument.You will need to stay away from sources that have a single political agendaWhat is rhetorical analysis?To begin, a rhetorical analysis is NOT a summary of a literary work or scholarly article. Also, this is difi?erentfiom analyng a section or character from literature in which you were required to summarize or paraphrase plotor story line. Trying to understand the meaning or interpretation of a work or summarize a story is NOT the goalof a rhetorical analysis! Arhetorical analysis is not a book report!Now that we have a quasi-working definition, a rhetorical analysis requires you to apply your critical readingskills in order to break down a text. In essence, you break off the parts from the whole of the piece you?reYou use the presentations of information (characters, theme, symbols, etc.) as a way of generating anargument about how well the writer captures the essence of their overall purpose. The goal of a rhetorical analysisis to articulate HOW the author writes, rather than WHAT they actually wrote. To do this, you will analyze thetheoretical strategies the author uses to achieve his or her goal or purpose of writing their piece. Keep in mind thatwriters of difl?erent disciplines often use varying writing strategies in order to achieve their goals. Since you arerequired to rhetorically analyze literature, you will be using theory as an approach for understanding how well thewriter demonstrates their overall purpose via a theoretical lens.How to rhetorically analyze?1. What is the thesis, what is the overall argument/purpose the author presents?2. What symbols does the text use?3. How does the writer use diction? (Word choice, arrangement, accuracy, is it formal, informal? Technical versus slang?)4. Does the writer use dialogue? Quotations? Why?5. What is the sentence structure of text? Are there fragments, run ons? Is it declarative, imperative, exclamatoiy? What efi?ect does this have?6. How does the author use the actions of characters to indicate his argument?7. How does the author use the perceptions of the characters to create his overall argumentpurpose?These are general questions to help you begin to understand how to approach a rhetorical analysis. Again, you arearguing how well the author uses theory to create a stronger connection and presentation of the characters and plotline to indicate his argument stance. When analyzing for the argument, keep in mind that this is largely going tobe based on your interpretation of the text, so read carefully! You will need to use your evaluation skills learned inessay two to better begin your rhetorical analysis of the text.Rhetorical Analysis Sample:Note: the sample below is a rhetorical analysis of how well the writer Howe uses the theory of New Historicismto create textual organization for his research book while creating a solid foundation for his argument.Although he does not connect migration mythmaking to the beginning of anAnglo-Saxon sense of nationalism the focus of Nicholas Howe?s book= Afigration and Afliz?hmaking in AngIo-Saxon England, does elucidate the impact of migration mythmaking on the imagination of literary texts. Using historical and political events: Howe argues that studying myth is to examine both a culture?s reordering of its past and also some of the finest expressions of its imagination (6). This New Historicism approach allows Howe to analyze the impact of earlier writings and authors, for example Bede?s Historia Ecclesiastica, on writers and poets such as VVulfstan and the Exodus poet. In an illuminatingly clear and concise manner= Howe explores the intricate relationship between Anglo-Saxon literature (both prose and poetry) and the historical events that shape the development of an Anglo- Saxon migration myth.Through an association between migration mythmaking and moments of crisis, Howe illustrates the reliance that figures and texts had on past historical events, focusing mainly on events such as the Viking raids. He begins with the infusion of history into the current events of Bishop Wulfstan?s Senna ad Anglos (8).The Rhetorical Situation Using either WEB Du Bois?s Double Consciousness and the Veil or Michel Foucault?s Panopticism as the foundation for theoretical discussion, analyze how well Boyle makes an argument concerning illegal immigration. For this rhetorical analysis assignment, you will need to begin by reading Boyle, Du Bois, and Foucault. Alter you have read all three pieces, you will then need to isolate what you believe is Boyle?s overall argument on the issue of illegal immigration. Prompts (choose one): 1. Analyze how well one of Boyle?s characters demonstrates the theory of either double consciousness or panopticism. 2. Analyze how well one of Boyle?s symbols (such as the wall or the coyote) demonstrates one of the ideas from either theoretical text. 3. Analyze how well Boyle captures the double consciousness of either the illegal migrant or the white citizen 4. Analyze how well Boyle uses the system of checks and balances (for this you will need to use the theory of panopticism) to create his argument concerning illegal immigration 5. Create a rhetorical argument of your own and make sure to clear it with me. Requirements and Skill Sets: Read with the eye of an evaluator and generate a strong stance for rhetorical analysis. Quote from your texts and make sure to integrate the quotes. a Summarize with purpose-use the summary of the text to illustrate your rhetorical analysis and explain how the summary supports your analysis. Thesis driven analysis argument. Must use Boyle and either Foucault or Du Bois. Must use ethos, pathos, and logos. MLA: both manuscript and citation format (in-text and works cited). Length: 4 to 6 pages. Attend conference Turn-in Procedures 0 Upload to Turnitin link via BB on before class. 0 Bring the following to turncin via your essay packet: Hardcopy of essay Rough, rough draft Peer Review handout and drafts Conference draft:
Welcome to Vision Essays! For over 10 years we have been helping students like you write, research, and generate ideas for their research papers, essays, term papers, dissertations, editing, resumes, and any other type of work your learning institution may assign you.
We can write any paper and have flexible payment plans with a minimum deadline of 6 Hrs.