legal and an ethical dimension.

67legal and an ethical dimension.1. (a) Identify the central issue in this case that has both a legal and an ethical dimension. Clearly state both the legal dimension/questionand the ethical dimension/question raised by the issue. 2. (b) Explain how the legal issue will be resolved by stating the law and then applying it to the facts to support your conclusion. 3. (c) Discuss the ethical dimension of this issue using one of the ethical forms of reasoning that we have discussed in class. (For yourconvenience, the four types of ethical reasons discussed in class are set out below.) In particular, make an argument about whether the likely legalresult in this case is also an ethical result. If the result is unethical, what could be done to address the situationADDITIONAL RESOURCES Four types of ethical reasoning ? ?? Consequences: we should promote good consequences and avoid bad ones, for all concerned, in the long run. (Happiness is good; pain isbad!) ? ?? Fairness/justice: we should make sure that good & bad consequences are distributed fairly. We should pay our debts and treat like casesalike. ? ?? Rights and Duties: we should protect rights and perform duties. These are often nearly absolute. ? ?? Character/virtue: we should consider what kind of people we want to be, and what example we want to set Remember that if you quote the above or paraphrase it, you must provide a citation. You can cite the above as follows: Chris MacDonald, Law 122Ethical Reasoning Module, Toronto, 2013.Important reminders about academic integrity and plagiarism ? Plagiarism is a serious academic offence and penalties range from zero in an assignment all the way to expulsion from the university. In anyacademic exercise, plagiarism occurs when one offers as one?s own work the words, data, ideas, arguments, calculations, designs or productions ofanother without appropriate attribution or whenone allows one?s work to be copied. Students should review the guidelines regarding academic misconduct. ? It is assumed that all examinations and work submitted for evaluation and course credit will be the product of individual effort, except inthe case of team projects arranged for and approved by the course instructor. ? Students must ensure that they understand the conventions for referencing sources in footnotes and bibliographies. In addition to citingquotations from all sources, whether from written materials, interviews, or electronic networks, students must credit with footnotes or in-textreferences all facts and ideas that are not their own, even if they are in their own words. If you do not, it is considered plagiarism. ? Submitting the same work to more than one course, without instructors? approval, is also considered plagiarism.Marking Rubric Unsatisfactory (0) Satisfactory (1) Exceeds Expectations (2) Ethical Issue Identification Is unable to articulate the ethical dimension of the problem Recognizes the ethical dimension of the problemRecognizes the ethical issue and articulates how the issue is related to/differs from the legal dimension Identification of the law relevant to the ethical dilemma and understanding of what the law requires Unable to recognize legal issue or apply lawRecognizes legal issue, but has difficulty articulating the application of the law/legal resolution Both recognizes the legal issue and arrivesat the likely legal outcome by appropriately applying the law Articulates a position about whether the character has acted ethically or not Fails to appreciate that an ethical outcome may require more thanmere adherence to the law and/or focuses exclusively on business reasoning (e.g., reputation). Provides a position on whether the character hasacted ethically or not, but fails to provide much elaboration Elaborates on/discusses the reasons for his/her position on whether the character hasacted ethically or not; identifies what the character could have done differently, if applicable. Justifies choice of position using ethical Fails to justify decision in terms of Defends position using ethical Coherently defends his or herposition 4 reasoning ethical reasoning (eg uses business considerations such as reputation and goodwill) reasoning; may display some weakness inapplication of ethical reasoning using an argument that draws on typical ethical reasoning; elaborates on reasons. Discusses alternativeoption for the character, if relevant. Grammar and Style Incoherent. No introduction, conclusion, or thesis statement. Standard essay format is evident (intro, body, conclusion,with a thesis). Proficiency in common rules of grammar (punctuation, sentence structure, etc). Strong written skills. Essay is cohesive andarguments are integrated well into overall body of essay. Mastery of basic rules of grammar and evidence of advanced capabilities (e.g., knows how touse a semi-colon).:

Welcome to Vision Essays! For over 10 years we have been helping students like you write, research, and generate ideas for their research papers, essays, term papers, dissertations, editing, resumes, and any other type of work your learning institution may assign you.

We can write any paper and have flexible payment plans with a minimum deadline of 6 Hrs.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page: