List and define the eight perspectives of personality psychology that are Discuss (check midcourse.net for the help you need)ed in this section.

List and define the eight perspectives of personality psychology that are Discuss (check midcourse.net for the help you need)ed in this section. What is the usefulness of studying eight perspectives of personality psychology?Chapter 1: What is Personality?The basic questions that personality psychologists seek to answer are, ?What makes us unique,? and ?What makes us a human being??II. Personality psychology is the scientific study of psychological forcesA. UnconsciousB. Ego forcesC. CognitiveD. BiologicalE. Conditioning/shapingF. Traits skillsC. Spiritual/existentialH. Person-situation interactionIll. Because personality psychologists use scientific methods to test their theories, conclusions as are much more reliable and valid (compared to those obtained from astrology ? palm-reading, physiognomy, etc.).A. Importance of data and statistics for scientific testing of many theoriesB. Distinction between correlation and causationIV. What are the sources of personality theories?A. Careful observation and deep introspection of insightful thinkersB. Systematic empirical researchC. Concepts borrowed from other disciplines (note that knowledge gleaned from other disciplines may also be used to test present theories? for instance, if new advances in biochemistry show that one theory of personally is impossible, the theory must then be reworked to be consistent with current biochemical knowledge).V. Preview of 8 different approaches to studying personalityA. PsychoanalyticB. Neo-analyticC. CognitiveD. BiologicalE. BehavioristF. Trait/skillG. Humanistic/existentialH. Person-situation interactionistVI Brief history of personality psychologyA. Theatre & self-presentationB. Religious influencesC. Evolutionary biologyD. Progression of testingVII. Modern theoriesA. Allport: The search for underlying organizational properties, with a focus on individuality.B. Lewin: Gestalt tradition, integrative nature of perception and thought, a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts; believed in the importance of changing situationC. Murray: emphasis on comprehensive orientation-longitudinal design; personologyD. M. Mead: Highlighted the importance of cross-cultural comparisons.VIII. Issues to be addressed throughout the courseA. The importance of the unconscious?B. The definition of the selfC. Unique vs. general approaches to studying people (nomothetic vs. idiographic)D. Male-female differencesF. Personal vs. situational influencesF. Cultural determinants of personalityC. Usefulness of personality for understanding behaviorH. The value of understanding each individualCHAPTER 2: HOW IS PERSONALITY STUDIED AND ASSESSED?This chapter first explains the importance of careful measurement, and goes on to talk about reliability and validity. Response sets and other biases are explained. This chapter then describes the ten basic types of assessment, and provides examples of each.I. What is sub active assessment? Measurement that relies on interpretation.A. Problems with subjective assessment: Judges may not agree in their judgments; even when they do agree, they may still he wrongB. Advantages of subjective assessment. Complex phenomena may be examined and valuable insights gainedII. What is reliability? Consistency in scores or ratings that are expected to be consistent. Random variations in measurement are called ?error of measurement? or ?errorvariance. What about different ways of assessing reliability?A. Internal consistency and split-halt reliabilityB. Cronbach?s coefficient alpha for internal consistencyC. Test-retest reliability (measure of consistency over time)Ill. But what happens when people change? When our environments influence us in different ways? How can we then have ?reliable? personality assessments?A. Look at personality as an underlying influence that affects behavior? that is,specific responses or behaviors might change over time, but consistent underlying patterns should be discernible.B. Look for consistency in the short term, but expect changes when looking over periods of many years. Also, expect to see some changes after life-changing transitions and/or traumatic events.IV. What is validity? Are we measuring what we think we are measuring? Construct validity is ascertained by finding whether behaviors, attitudes, etc. that are theoretically relevant to the construct can be predicted by the measureA. Convergent Validity: a measure is related to what it should be related toB. Discriminant Validity: a measure is not related to what it should not be related toC. Construct Validity: the extent to which a test truly measures a theoretical constructD. Criterion-related Validity: the measure can predict important outcome criteriaF. Content Validity: the measure accurately measures the domain it is supposed toF. Because proper test validation requires the establishment of several differenttypes of validity, and the assessment of various traits, it is called ?Multitrait-Multimethod"V. How does one choose items to include in a personality test?A. Items should discriminate among individuals with varying levels of the measured traitB. Items should be inter-correlated, but not so highly that they are overly redundantC. The final assessment should have a normal distribution (individuals very high or very low, well as in the middle, should be measurable with the test)VI. The problem of response sets and what to do about themA. An ?acquiescence response set? is the tendency for some people to be more likely toagree with anything you ask them1. Some items should be reverse-coded to help eliminate this bias.B. A ?social desirability response set? is people?s tendency to present themselves in favorable light.1. Items should be worded as neutrally as possible to avoid this biasC. Lie scales may be used to pick up random response patterns, or those who are lyingD. It?s best to use several different methods of assessment, since none is without biasVII. What about problem of biases in psychological testing? All tests must make assumptions about the background, knowledge, and abilities of the person taking the test. Some of these assumptions will be incorrect. This doesn?t mean that tests should not be used, it just means that we must be careful in our interpretations, and context to which results are appliedA. Ethnic bias is one of the most common forms of bias? a characteristic that may be o one culture is perceived as a weakness or deficiency in anotherB. Gender bias is also common? characteristics that are strengths for one group, or that are simply not socialized for one group, are perceived as weaknesses or ?missing? for another groupVIII. What are the different kinds of personality tests?A. Self report tests; these are usually pencil and paper tests (questionnaires). Some examples include the MMPI, MCMI, NEO-PI, and MBTIB. Another type of self-report test, which may be more flexible than the traditional questionnaire, is the Q-sort. The individual places cards, each with a descriptive word or term, into piles indicating how characteristic the descriptor is of him or her. The piles are arranged into a forced-normal distribution (that is, only a few e cards can he placed in the ?most characteristic? or ?least characteristic? piles).C. Ratings and judgments; this is when someone else fills out a questionnaire or were questions about the target (participant)D. Biological measures; early attempts included phrenology and body-typing, while some more modern variations include things like palm reading. More reliable forms of biological assessment include recording brain waves, levels of brain chemicals, and hormonesE. Behavioral observations; these include actually watching people perform various behaviors, as well as experience sampling (such as having a person carry a beeper and then write down what he or she is doing each time the beeper goes off).F. Interviews; these include unstructured interviews (which are more free and thuspotentially more rich, but also more difficult to assess in terms of validity) and structured interviews (more valid, but also more likely to miss important individual nuances). In general, interviews of any type are easily biased by the pre conceptions and behaviors of the interviewer1. A nice example of a structured interview is the interview used to assess the Type A behavior patternG. Expressive behavior; this involves a careful analysis of how people do things-how they move or talk, for example? rather than what they do. Expressive style is often biased by cultural arid gender-related factorsH. Document analysis; this technique involves careful analysis of an individual?s writings such as letters, diaries, etc. Writings such as these are most useful as supplements to other sources of information, but may be a rich source of data in to their own rightI. Projective tests; these assessment tools require one to draw a picture, complete a sentence, tell a story about an ambiguous stimulus, or interpret an ambiguous stimulus. The goal is to gain access to unconscious motives and concerns, but again there is a lot of room for bias in interpretation1. Some good examples of projective tests include the Rorschach Inkblot Test, the Thematic Apperception Test, and the Draw-A-Person TestJ. Demographics; this includes gathering information about the person?s age, place of birth, religion, family size, etc. Although these variables are not psychological in nature, they can aid in reaching a more complete understanding of the makeup of an individualIX. How not to test personalityA. Using the tars to understand personality (astrology) is rarely usefulB. Physical body measures such as phrenology are not validC. Palm reading, numerology, and handwriting analysis may be fun, but usually do not tell us ver: much about personalityX. Research Designa. Case studies1. A Case study is an in-depth study of an individual2. Different methods including document analysis, self-report measures, and assessments of expressive behavior may be used in combination to learn at: out an individualb. Correlational Studies1. Correlational studies assess the degree of relationship between two variables.2. Correlations do not tell us anything about causal relationshipsc. Experiments1. Experiments allow us to determine causal inferences2. In true experimental design, people are randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group, and then the two groups are compared3. Quasi-experimental designs (naturally occurring experiments) are used when circumstances make it impossible (or very difficult) to randomly assign people to conditionsXl. What are some of the ethical issues in personality testing?A. Test results will always contain some ?error? and thus will always be somewhat inaccurateB. When these tests are used to identify those who should be excluded from something (like school, medical treatment, etc.), these errors become very important.C. The fact that errors do occur should not preclude our making use of the psychological assessment tools that are available.D. Instead, we must be careful at many points in the assessment process1. In our interpretation of test results2. When choosing how to apply our knowledge3. In the construction of new tests4. Open to revision of ?tried and true? measures if new information becomes available.Copyright ? 1995-2002 by Allyn & Bacon A Pearson CompanyORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!Category: Essay Writing

Welcome to Vision Essays! For over 10 years we have been helping students like you write, research, and generate ideas for their research papers, essays, term papers, dissertations, editing, resumes, and any other type of work your learning institution may assign you.

We can write any paper and have flexible payment plans with a minimum deadline of 6 Hrs.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: